Event

Administrative Discretion in the EU: comparative and normative perspectives

  • Lieu

    University of Luxembourg Room B.001 (Ground floor) Weicker Building 4, rue Alphonse Weicker L-2721 Luxembourg

    LU

Discretion lies at the heart of administrative law systems and of different legal and academic traditions on the relative role of courts and administrations in each constitutional system. The boundaries of different types of administrative discretion have also shifted as administrative systems evolved and expanded into new socio-economic areas. In different fields, procedures, norms and institutions directed at steering and controlling the exercise of administrative discretion are now fundamentally shaped by EU law, in composite systems created to advance or sustain European integration. We have gathered scholars whose work has dealt with administrative discretion, either as a focus or through their analysis of national or sectoral law, to bring together different perspectives on current forms which discretion might be taking, how legal systems may be adapting and on current debates on the relationship between law and discretion from their legal systems or fields of research.

9:00-9:15. Welcoming remarks

 

 

Overcoming the Divided Nature of Administrative Discretion in Germany

Discretionary power in France: past, present, and future of an aporie

Searching for a balance: the judicial control of discretionary powers in Italy

11:20-13:30. Sectoral perspectives 

Judicial review of Commission discretion in setting fines for breaches of EU competition rules – the limits of unlimited jurisdiction

Discretion in environmental matters: what balance between assessment of complexity and development of procedural requirements?

 

Discretions and options in Banking Union

Daniel Sarmiento (University Complutense of Madrid) 

 

14:30-16:30.Rethinking administrative discretion 

The rule governing (administrative) action and the rule governing (judicial) control

Discretionary powers in administrative action: the impossibility of dogmatic distinctions

 

“Administrative discretion”, “power of appraisal” and “margin of appraisal” in judicial review proceedings before the General Court